Sunday, January 3, 2010

Best & Worst Movies of 2009



10 Best Movies of '09
(in order)
10 Worst Movies of '09
(in order)
  1. District 9
  2. Avatar
  3. Watchmen
  4. Star Trek
  5. Ip Man
  6. Drag Me To Hell
  7. Sin Nombre
  8. (500) Days of Summer
  9. Ong Bak 2
  10. Taken

  1. The Fourth Kind
  2. Pink Panther 2
  3. Bruno
  4. Humpday
  5. Tetro
  6. Inkheart
  7. Post Grad
  8. New In Town
  9. 17 Again
  10. The Spy Next Door

Monday, November 2, 2009

REVIEW: The Fourth Kind

STARRING: Milla Jovovich
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 11/13/09
DATE SCREENED: 10/20/09

The Verdict
SUCKS - Don't Waste Your Time

For those of you that don’t know, there are supposedly four classifications of alien encounters. The First Kind is a UFO sighting. The Second Kind is collecting evidence of the UFO. The Third Kind is contact with Extra Terrestrials. The Fourth Kind is alien abduction. The film The Fourth Kind claims to be based on “actual case studies” that “prove” alien abductions. Let me make this clear right way – there is no such thing as actual case studies that prove alien abductions. But I was curious to see if the film was well done enough to convince people in the audience that there is such footage. Some people actually believe Paranormal Activity is real footage, and that has led that film to become a huge hit.

The Fourth Kind centers on Dr. Abigail Tyler (Milla Jovovich), a psychologist in the small town of Nome, Alaska. It seems this town’s residents have disappeared under mysterious circumstances since back in the ‘60s. In the present day, Dr. Tyler begins to see a string of traumatized patients who being to detail similar incidents of alien abduction while under hypnosis. Throughout the film we see dramatizations mixed with “actual archival footage”. This means we see interviews with the “real” Dr. Abigail Tyler and footage of her patients interspersed with interviews of Milla as Dr. Tyler and other actors playing her patients. Eventually Dr. Tyler herself is on the couch with her own alien abduction story to tell.

In theory it is a good idea to creep people out with this idea of mixing spooky "actual footage" into a movie. But in this case the execution is horrible. There is not one thing in this movie that convinced me it could be real. The very first interview with the “real” pale & lifeless Dr. Tyler felt like I was watching an actress. The “archival footage” of people under hypnosis goes way too far and becomes too dramatic to be authentic. As I sat there in the theater, bored out of my mind, I wondered to myself if anyone in the theater was actually buying into any of this. My question was answered when during one of the more ridiculous segments of “actual footage” of a guy floating, someone yelled out "this is bull s@#$". After another ridiculous scene people started laughing. You’d have to be pretty stupid to believe any of the “real footage”. This will not go down alongside Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity as that rare scary movie that people believed could be real. The trailer is creepier than the entire movie. This movie really sucks… don’t waste your time.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

REVIEW: District 9

STARRING: Sharlto Copley
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 08/14/09
DATE SCREENED: 08/05/09

The Verdict
GREAT - See it opening weekend


The summer movie season got off to a good start with Wolverine and Star Trek but quickly fizzled. I was intrigued by the trailer for District 9, which does what a good trailer is supposed to do. It only gives you a taste of what the movie is going to be about, instead of giving away parts of the best scenes. Although I was intrigued, after the disappointment I’ve experienced this summer I wasn’t about to get my hopes up too high. After all, District 9 didn’t have any known actors and only a $30 million budget (GI Joe cost $175 million). The only thing the movie had going for it on paper was producer Peter Jackson (Lord of the Rings). It turns out that District 9 has a lot more going for it than what you see on paper. I left the theater excited by having seen a great movie that exceeded all my expectations.

28 years prior to the beginning of the film, a giant disabled alien spaceship ends up floating right above Johannesburg South Africa. The aliens on board are sick and transferred to the surface. The aliens are forced to live in a slum called District 9, while the world argues over what to do with them.

In the present day, the aliens live in poverty with Nigerian gangs. They exchange alien technology/goods for cat food and sneak out of the District to steal from others. The South African population refers to them by the racist term of “prawns”. Scientist have been working unsuccessfully to figure out how to use the alien technology, including their weapons. A private company, MNU, is hired to remove the aliens from their slum to a more remote prison like location. By law they must give the aliens 24 hr notice. While serving notice, the lead MNU field agent, Wikus van der Merwe, is infected with an alien virus while examining an alien device. This infection begins to slowly transform him into one of the aliens. Doctors discover that this transformation allows him to fire alien weapons which are activated by DNA. This makes his body a valuable possession to the military, and permission is granted to kill Wikus and harvest his body parts. Of course, this does not sit well with Wikus, and he manages to escape. He runs to District 9 to find the owner of the device that infected him to seek a cure. The owner is an alien who has been named Christopher Johnson. It turns out Christopher has spent the last 28 years working on an escape plan, but needs the device that infected Wikus to finally execute the plan. The device is now locked up tight at MNU headquarters. Wikus agrees to help get the device back, in exchange for a cure.

Wikus steals some alien weaponry that was being hoarded by a Nigerian gang, and then the film kicks into overdrive. Wikus and his new alien friend Christopher attack MNU headquarters to retrieve the device, which it turns out is fuel. Then they must fend off an all out military assault, and a Nigerian gang assault, when they get back to District 9. What was a serious character driven film turns into a kick-ass action movie for the final act. But all the action has a purpose and I really cared about who was going to live and who was going to die. District 9 brilliantly draws you into the story and makes you care about the characters before blowing you away with the action.

The film has much more going for it than just a famous producer. Most important, it has a great script. It attempts to realistically portray what might happen if about a million aliens ended up stranded on Earth. We see how being forced to live on Earth in poverty with no human education has led to deep rooted racism against what is actually a brilliant alien race. College students could write papers on the parallels between this film and apartheid.

The film also has Sharlto Copley playing Wikus going for it. He shows us that he is a great actor, even though this is his very first role. His character is well fleshed out, as we see how he relates to his wife and how he is forced to question his racist beliefs about the “prawns”. Although the aliens are mostly special effects, the relationship between Christopher and his son felt very real.

The special effects are seamless. I don’t know how they managed such stellar special effects on a $30 million budget. The final battle is more intense and well done than what I have seen in movies that cost 5 or 6 times as much.

District 9 is a great movie that needs to be seen opening weekend. It’s rare for a movie to exceed my expectations like this one has. It’s probably the best film I’ve seen all year, and should be a contender come Oscar time.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

REVIEW: The Goods: Live Hard, Sell Hard

STARRING: Jeremy Piven, Ving Rhames
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 08/14/09
DATE SCREENED: 07/27/09

The Verdict
NOT GOOD - Wait for cable

I began to lose interest in the show Entourage a couple of seasons ago, but Jeremy Piven’s portrayal of foul-mouthed super agent Ari Gold still manages to keep me tuning in. Piven’s portrayal of Ari has made him a multiple Emmy winner and turned him into the most popular actor on the show. Movie studios have taken notice. They have been trying to come up with the right role to capitalize on Piven’s television success. Some studio executive got the brilliant idea to make a movie featuring Piven as a sleazy car salesman. After all, if he can play a sleazy agent, then playing a sleazy car salesman should give his fans exactly what they are looking for, right? Well, not exactly…

When a failing auto dealership needs a big 4th of July weekend of sales to avoid going out of business, they call in the best team of used car liquidators that money can buy. Led by Don Ready (Piven), this team of used car salesmen promises to train the current staff and sell every single car on the lot by the end of the weekend. They sell cars by day and party at strip clubs by night. They use every dirty trick in the book to sell cars. While Don Ready and his crew are ripping off the public and selling cars, there are also subplots involving possible romances between Don and the auto dealership owner’s daughter, a female member of Don’s crew and the owners’ 10 year old son that looks like an adult, and the owner himself and another one of Don’s male crew members. The latter two subplots are particularly awful.

The only good thing this movie has going for it is the cast. Piven is basically playing Ari Gold selling cars, and he’s good at that character. Ving Rhames, David Koechner, and Kathryn Hahn make up his crew and they do the best they can with the material. They take a lot of bad jokes, and at least deliver them in a way that makes you smile. Otherwise, this movie is easily forgettable. It’s filled with gay jokes, pedophile jokes, racial stereotypes, and general silliness. They must have spent the entire budget on the cast, and nothing on the writing. This film is further proof that you can’t simply take a popular TV character and basically throw him into a movie and it will turn out good. If Piven wants to be a big movie star he is going to have to step out of his comfort zone a little bit and look for a good script. Wait for cable to watch this sorry movie.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

REVIEW: A Perfect Getaway

STARRING: Steve Zahn, Milla Jovovich
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 08/07/09
DATE SCREENED: 08/04/09

The Verdict
OK - Wait for the DVD

Anyone who has seen the commercial knows that A Perfect Getaway does not depict the kind of vacation experience that would be featured on the Travel Channel. Newlyweds Cliff (Steve Zahn) and Cydney (Milla Jovovich) think they are about to have the honeymoon of their dreams. They arrive on one of the most remote and picturesque islands of Hawaii for three days of lounging on the beach and hiking the secluded trails. When they stumble upon a group of teenaged hikers discussing the recent murder of a newlywed couple, they begin to get nervous. They immediately suspect a strange couple that they came across earlier in the day hitchhiking may be the murderers.

Cliff & Cydney find some comfort and fun hiking with another couple they meet along the trail, Nick (Timothy Olyphant) and Gina (Kiele Sanchez). Nick is ex-military and has all kinds of strange survival stories. When he slaughters a goat and Gina skins it, Cliff & Cydney begin to suspect their new friends may be the killers. But with nowhere to go, the couples must hike together to civilization, and the hitchhikers may be following them. The last couple of miles become the longest miles, as the trip quickly becomes a literal fight for survival.

A Perfect Getaway is a modern “B-movie”. It doesn’t try to be great cinema, but simply entertain an audience for approximately 90 minutes. The movie does have a few thrills and surprises. The problem is that it takes too long to get going, and the surprises aren’t really that surprising. When the characters define the term “red herring” for the audience it’s a dead giveaway that things are not quite as they seem. I expected the film to have some scary scenes, but it’s strictly a thriller. The actors do a commendable job in what they surely looked at as an easy paycheck. The audience at the screening did seem to enjoy the film more than I did, but I can’t recommend spending the money to see this in the theater. It’s an average film, best viewed at home on DVD.

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

REVIEW: Bruno

STARRING: Sacha Baron Cohen
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 07/10/09
DATE SCREENED: 07/07/09

The Verdict
NOT GOOD - Wait for cable

“Borat was so 2006”. That’s the tagline for Sacha Baron Cohen’s Borat follup-up Bruno. Sacha stars as the title character, a flamboyantly gay Austrian fashion talk show host. Bruno makes it his life’s goal to become famous in America. The film follows his attempts to reach his goal, by any means necessary.

Although I was not a big fan of Borat, I did like the idea behind it, which is also the idea behind this movie. The idea is to take an outrageous character and put him in real life situations to see how people react and to expose their prejudices. In the case of Bruno, the idea is to expose how people would react to such an outrageous gay character. The funniest example is when Bruno shows up on a talk show with his African son that he obtained in an exchange for an iPod. The all-black audience is hilariously outraged. Another funny moment is when Bruno shows up at a swingers party, attempting to hide his homosexuality. And prejudices are fully exposed when Bruno reveals his homosexuality inside the cage of a Mixed Martial Arts event.

The problem with Bruno is that the funny moments are few and far between, even though the film is only 80 minutes. The movie hits some disgusting low points when it veers off its mission in order to delve into Bruno’s sexual practices. I really don’t know how this film managed to obtain an ‘R’ rating. I had to look away from the screen at times. The film tries too hard to be outrageous and shocking, instead of simply letting the real life situations generate the laughs. With a movie like Bruno you can’t help but wonder how much was real and how much was staged, but ultimately the movie will be judged by how funny it is. The few high points don’t outweigh the disgusting lows. Wait for this one to come on cable. You will know in the first 10 minutes whether or not you can stomach this movie or simply want to change the channel.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

REVIEW: Drag Me To Hell

STARRING: Alison Lohman, Justin Long
View Trailer

RELEASE DATE: 05/29/09
DATE SCREENED: 05/26/09

The Verdict
GREAT - See it opening weekend

I generally don’t see horror movies, unless they involve vampires. Sam Raimi’s return to his horror film roots with Drag Me To Hell originally meant nothing to me. I haven’t seen any of his previous horror film efforts like The Evil Dead. Then something strange happened as I sat in the theater about a month ago and saw the trailer for Drag Me To Hell. The trailer made the entire audience almost jump from their seats. As it ended people were proclaiming they either had to see it, or would never see it. For the first time in a very long time the trailer for a horror movie actually made me want to see it. I’ve been singing the praises of the trailer for a month, so I was very excited to finally see Drag Me To Hell.

After the opening sequence there is no doubt as to the purpose of the film’s title. A young boy stole a necklace from a gypsy and had been cursed back in 1969. The scene ends with the boy literally being dragged to hell. It was surprising, as kids don’t usually get killed off in movies. The scene switches to the present day, where Christine Brown (Alison Lohman) is an L.A. loan officer vying for a promotion to an assistant manager position. Her boss tells her that she must show him that she is willing to make the tough decisions. A sick old woman named Mrs. Ganush happens to come into the bank on the wrong day. She needs an extension on her home loan, but Christine denies her the extension to prove that she is capable of making the tough decisions. This turns out to be a big mistake, as the old woman attacks Christine in the parking lot and puts a curse on her. Christine and her unbelieving boyfriend Clay (Justin Long) visit a psychic who tells Christine about the curse that has been put on her. Christine will be haunted by a demon for three days, after which time she will be dragged to hell. The clock is ticking as she attempts to fight back against the demon using the same Psychic who failed to save the boy back in 1969.

Drag Me To Hell isn’t the kind of intense horror film I was expecting. It’s much more fun than I could have imagined. The scene where Christine is attacked in the parking lot is tense, frightening, and hilarious at the same time. A séance sequence is another unforgettable combination of scares and laughs. Alison Lohman does a great job as Christine, going from a mild mannered loan officer to a “bad ass” willing to do whatever it takes to fight this demon. I’ve heard that some of Raimi’s previous horror films also have this blend of horror and comedy, but it was a completely new experience for me. This is the kind of movie that works best as a shared experience in a crowded theater. The film takes a simple plot and does a lot with it, forcing the audience to react countless times. I see so many movies that I forget a lot of what I see. There are scenes in Drag Me To Hell that I may never forget, and that’s the sign of a great movie. See this one opening weekend. Even if you are the type of person that doesn't generally like horror you should give this one a try.